CRUSE® -An innovative mobile application for patient monitoring and management in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is unpredictable and can severely impair patients' quality of life. Patients with CSU need a convenient, user-friendly platform to complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on their mobile devices. CRUSE® , the Chronic Urticaria Self Evaluation app, aims to address this unmet need. METHODS: CRUSE® was developed by an international steering committee of urticaria specialists. Priorities for the app based on recent findings in CSU were defined to allow patients to track and record their symptoms and medication use over time and send photographs. The CRUSE® app collects patient data such as age, sex, disease onset, triggers, medication, and CSU characteristics that can be sent securely to physicians, providing real-time insights. Additionally, CRUSE® contains PROMs to assess disease activity and control, which are individualised to patient profiles and clinical manifestations. RESULTS: CRUSE® was launched in Germany in March 2022 and is now available for free in 17 countries. It is adapted to the local language and displays a country-specific list of available urticaria medications. English and Ukrainian versions are available worldwide. From July 2022 to June 2023, 25,710 observations were documented by 2540 users; 72.7% were females, with a mean age of 39.6 years. At baseline, 93.7% and 51.3% of users had wheals and angioedema, respectively. Second-generation antihistamines were used in 74.0% of days. CONCLUSIONS: The initial data from CRUSE® show the wide use and utility of effectively tracking patients' disease activity and control, paving the way for personalised CSU management.

Urticarial Vasculitis Differs From Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Time to Diagnosis, Clinical Presentation, and Need for Anti-Inflammatory Treatment: An International Prospective UCARE Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and urticarial vasculitis (UV) share several clinical features including the occurrence of wheals. As of yet, the criteria for differentiating the 2 disorders are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aimed to identify differences, similarities, and the likelihood for specific clinical features in patients with UV versus those with CSU. METHODS: Across 10 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence, 106 patients with skin biopsy-confirmed UV and 126 patients with CSU were prospectively recruited to complete a questionnaire on the clinical features, course, and response to treatment of their disease. RESULTS: As compared with CSU, patients with UV more often experienced postinflammatory skin hyperpigmentation, wheals of ≥24-hour duration, eye inflammation, and fever (6.9, 4.0, 3.6, and 2.4 times, respectively). Clinical features that increased the risk for UV diagnosis when present at the onset of disease included wheals of ≥24-hour duration (7.3-fold), pain of the skin (7.0-fold), postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (4.1-fold), and fatigue (3.1-fold). The diagnostic delay was markedly longer for normocomplementemic UV as compared with hypocomplementemic UV and CSU (21 vs 5 vs 6 months, respectively). Oral corticosteroids and omalizumab were the most effective treatments in patients with UV and CSU, respectively. Patients with UV showed a higher need for immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapies than patients with CSU. CONCLUSIONS: Long wheal duration, skin pain and hyperpigmentation, and systemic symptoms point to UV rather than CSU as the underlying disease and should prompt further diagnostic workup including a skin biopsy.

A homozygous loss-of-function C1S mutation is associated with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease.

BACKGROUND: Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease (KFD) is a self-limited inflammatory disease of unknown pathogenesis. Familial cases have been described and defects in classical complement components C1q and C4 have been identified in some patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe genetic and immune investigations of a 16 years old Omani male, a product of consanguineous marriage, who presented with typical clinical and histological features of KFD. RESULTS: We identified a novel homozygous single base deletion in C1S (c.330del; p. Phe110LeufsTer23) resulting in a defect in the classical complement pathway. The patient was negative for all serological markers of SLE. In contrast, two female siblings (also homozygous for the C1S mutation), one has autoimmune thyroid disease (Hashimoto thyroiditis) and a positive ANA and the other sibling has serology consistent with SLE. CONCLUSION: We report the first association between C1s deficiency and KFD.

Consensus on diagnosis and management of Hereditary Angioedema in the Middle East: A Delphi initiative.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE), a potentially life-threatening genetic disorder due to C1 inhibitor deficiency in most cases, is characterized by sudden and/or recurrent attacks of angioedema (subcutaneous/submucosal swellings). The global World Allergy Organization (WAO)/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) International guideline for HAE management is comprehensive, but the implementation of this guideline may require regional adaptation considering the diversity in disease awareness, type of medical care systems, and access to diagnostics and treatment. The aim of this Delphi initiative was to build on the global guideline and provide regional adaptation to address the concerns and specific needs in the Middle East. Methods: The Consensus panel comprised 13 experts from the Middle East (3 from the United Arab Emirates, 3 from Saudi Arabia, 2 from Lebanon, 2 from Kuwait, 2 from Oman and 1 from Qatar) who have more than 2 decades of experience in allergy and immunology and are actively involved in managing HAE patients. The process that was carried out to reach the consensus recommendation included: 1.) A systematic literature review for articles related to HAE management using Ovid MEDLINE. 2.) The development of a questionnaire by an internationally acclaimed expert, with 10 questions specific to HAE management in the Middle East. 3.) Experts received the questionnaire via email individually and their answers were recorded (email/interview). 4.) A virtual consensus meeting was organized to discuss the questionnaire, make amends if needed, vote, and achieve consensus. Results: The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, each with 2 or more statements/recommendations on which the regional experts voted. A consensus was reached based on a 70% agreement between the participants. The key highlights include: 1) HAE experts in the Middle East emphasized the importance of a positive family history for arriving at a diagnosis of HAE. 2) The number of episodes per month or per 6-month period and severity should be used, together with other markers, to determine the need for prophylaxis. 3) Disease status should be monitored by periodic visits and the use of patient-reported outcome measures such as the angioedema activity score and the angioedema control test. 4) Attenuated androgens and tranexamic acid may be considered for long-term prophylaxis, if lanadelumab, C1-Inhibitor or berotralstat are not available. Conclusion: This consensus recommendation may help to educate healthcare practitioners in the Middle East and unify their approach to the diagnosis and management of HAE.

Real World Management of Anaphylaxis Versus the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidelines.

Objectives  Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening immediate allergic reaction caused by the sudden systemic release of mediators from mast cells. This study aims to assess the current practice of emergency management of children and adults diagnosed with anaphylaxis at the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman, in line with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.  Methods This is an observational retrospective study of all anaphylaxis cases seen at the emergency department (ED) from January 2013 to January 2018 and compared with the management of anaphylaxis in the ED as per the NICE guidelines. Inclusion criteria were all patients, children (age 16 and below), and adults diagnosed with anaphylaxis based on the World Allergy Organization (WAO) criteria. Exclusion criteria are all cases labeled as anaphylaxis that did not match the WAO criteria for anaphylaxis. Results Of 100 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of anaphylaxis, 49 patients (49%) were true-anaphylaxis cases based on the WAO definition 16 were children (age 16 years and below), and 33 were adults ( age 16 years and above). The other 51 patients (51%) with misdiagnosed anaphylaxis were later diagnosed with spontaneous urticaria, septic shock, vocal cord dysfunction, severe asthma, and anxiety attack. All 49 patients with true-anaphylaxis appropriately received adrenaline intramuscularly at the ED. All 16 children were admitted, seen by an allergist, and received an adrenaline auto-injector when indicated. Only 5 of the 33 adults were admitted and seen by an allergist, and 4 of those required an adrenaline auto-injector upon discharge. The remaining 28 adults were discharged from the ED, and only 3 of these were referred to the allergist. None received an adrenaline auto-injector upon discharge from the ED, and no mention in the ED notes on patient education regarding allergen avoidance. Conclusion Third of the patients who presented to ED were children (<16 years), and two third were adults. Insect venom was the main reason for anaphylaxis in both age groups. There was an underutilization of adrenaline auto-injector prescriptions for adult patients. This could be very well improved by disseminating policies and guidelines to adult physicians.

Immune Dysregulation in Monogenic Inborn Errors of Immunity in Oman: Over A Decade of Experience From a Single Tertiary Center.

Background: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are being recognized as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in communities with a high frequency of consanguinity, such as Oman, and thus recessively inherited conditions. Various monogenic causes of IEI have been recently discovered; however, the disease phenotype may be variable and does not always include infection at presentation, leading to a delay in diagnosis and a poor outcome. It is now well recognized that immune dysregulation manifestations are observed in a significant proportion of patients with IEI and occasionally precede infection. Methods: Here, we retrospectively report the epidemiological, clinical, immunological, and molecular findings and outcomes from 239 patients with IEI who were diagnosed and managed at the Royal Hospital, Oman, from January 2010 to October 2021. Results: The estimated annual cumulative mean incidence of IEI was 25.5 per 100,000 Omani live births with a total prevalence of 15.5 per 100,000 Omani population. Both the high incidence and prevalence are attributed to the high rate of consanguinity (78.2%). Defects affecting cellular and humoral immunity including severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), combined immunodeficiency (CID), and CID with syndromic features were the predominant defects in IEI (36%). Immune dysregulation was a prominent manifestation and occurred in approximately a third of all patients with IEI (32%), with a mean age of onset of 81 months and a mean diagnostic delay of 50.8 months. The largest percentage of patients who showed such clinical signs were in the category of diseases of immune dysregulation (41%), followed by predominantly antibody deficiency (18%). The overall mortality rate in our cohort was 25.1%, with higher death rates seen in CID including SCID and diseases of immune dysregulation. Conclusion: Immune dysregulation is a frequent manifestation of Omani patients with IEI. Early detection through raising awareness of signs of IEI including those of immune dysregulation and implementation of newborn screening programs will result in early intervention and improved overall outcome.

Expert Opinion on Biological Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in the Gulf Region.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is defined as the inflammation of nose and paranasal sinuses, affecting the patients' quality of life and productivity. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a principal clinical entity confirmed by the existence of chronic sinonasal inflammation and is characterized by anterior or posterior rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, hyposmia and/or facial pressure or facial pain. Several epidemiologic studies have revealed wide variations in the incidence of CRS among regions globally ranging from 4.6% to 12%. The Gulf countries are also witnessing an unprecedented burden of CRSwNP. According to the current clinical guidelines, glucocorticosteroids and antibiotics are the principal pharmacotherapeutic approaches. Endoscopic sinus surgery is recommended for those who have failed maximal pharmacotherapy. Recently, biologics are considered as an alternative best approach due to the complications associated with medical therapy and surgery. However, precise data on the clinical position of biologic agents in the management of CRSwNP in the Gulf region is not available. The present review article addresses the current diagnostic and management approaches for CRSwNP and also emphasizes the role of emerging biologics in the current treatment strategies for CRSwNP in the Gulf region. Further, a consensus protocol was convened to rationalize the guideline recommendations, strategize the best practices with biologics, and develop clinical practice guidelines for all primary-care specialists in the Gulf region. The consensus-based report will be a useful reference tool for primary-care physicians in primary-healthcare settings, regarding the appropriate time for the initiation of biological treatment in the Gulf region.

Successful Desensitization to the Radiocontrast Material Iohexol (Omnipaque™).

Adverse reactions to radiocontrast media (RCM) are rare and occur predominantly in association with intravenous administration but may also occur with intra-arterial and nonvascular injections (e.g., retrograde pyelography, intra-articular injections) of RCM. This article reports the case of a 52-year-old lady who was known to have amyloidosis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis and was on regular renal replacement therapy. She was under follow-up for regular angioplasties to manage the central vein stenosis that was affecting her right brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and was referred to our Immunology service when she developed an allergic reaction after her AVF angioplasty (central venoplasty). Despite being dialysed immediately post-angioplasty, she complained of skin rash and itching with hoarseness of voice that developed almost six to eight hours post-angioplasty. We decided to arrange the iodinated non-ionic iso-osmolar contrast agent iodixanol (Visipaque™) for her instead, as it is known to be better tolerated in patients with reactions to Omnipaque™ due to its lower osmolarity as compared to Omnipaque™. However, since it was the first time to request this contrast in our hospital, it was not possible due to logistical reasons. It was necessary that our patient continued to undergo angioplasty every three months, however, she was developing more severe and earlier symptoms with each subsequent exposure to the radiocontrast medium. After her latest reaction of generalized itching and angioedema with shortness of breath during the procedure despite premedication, it was decided for her to undergo desensitization to Omnipaque™. In the absence of a published protocol for this, we used a protocol used for desensitization to Visipaque™. She showed an excellent response and completed her remaining angioplasties until Visipaque™ became available. Hence, desensitization to Omnipaque™ using the published protocol to Visipaque™ is likely to help patients allergic to Omnipaque™ or where Visipaque™ is not available or non-affordable in low/middle-income countries.

Immunological predictors of disease severity in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the immune cells involved in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease progression and the predictors of poor outcomes is important to manage patients adequately. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled 48 patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Oman and 53 non-hospitalized patients with confirmed mild COVID-19. RESULTS: Hospitalized patients were older (58 years vs 36 years, P < 0.001) and had more comorbid conditions such as diabetes (65% vs 21% P < 0.001). Hospitalized patients had significantly higher inflammatory markers (P < 0.001): C-reactive protein (114 vs 4 mg/l), interleukin 6 (IL-6) (33 vs 3.71 pg/ml), lactate dehydrogenase (417 vs 214 U/l), ferritin (760 vs 196 ng/ml), fibrinogen (6 vs 3 g/l), D-dimer (1.0 vs 0.3 µg/ml), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy score (2 vs 0), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (4 vs 1.1) (P < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, statistically significant independent early predictors of intensive care unit admission or death were higher levels of IL-6 (odds ratio 1.03, P = 0.03), frequency of large inflammatory monocytes (CD14+CD16+) (odds ratio 1.117, P = 0.010), and frequency of circulating naïve CD4+ T cells (CD27+CD28+CD45RA+CCR7+) (odds ratio 0.476, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: IL-6, the frequency of large inflammatory monocytes, and the frequency of circulating naïve CD4 T cells can be used as independent immunological predictors of poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients to prioritize critical care and resources.

Eosinophilic Fasciitis Responds Well to Steroids and Methotrexate.

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare systemic inflammatory disease with an unknown etiology. Making a diagnosis in such a case is always a challenge as it is a rare disease and mimics scleroderma and scleroderma-like syndrome but should be kept in mind as it carries a high mortality. Furthermore, it is a treatable disease. Here, we report a 41-year-old woman who presented to the rheumatology clinic at the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman, with a one-month history of bilateral swelling of the forearms along with skin tightness and fingers contraction. Her history and physical examination along with histopathological examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with EF. She showed an excellent response to steroids and methotrexate which is not a combination therapy that has been tried or mentioned previously.

Approach to patients with refractory coeliac disease.

Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) is a recognised complication, albeit very rare, of coeliac disease (CD). This condition is described when individuals with CD continue to experience enteropathy and subsequent or ongoing malabsorption despite strict adherence to a diet devoid of gluten for at least 12 months and when all other causes mimicking this condition are excluded. Depending on the T-cell morphology and T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality at the ß/γ loci, RCD can be subdivided into type 1 (normal intra-epithelial lymphocyte morphology, polyclonal TCR population) and type 2 (aberrant IELs with clonal TCR). It is important to differentiate between the two types as type 1 has an 80% survival rate and is managed with strict nutritional and pharmacological management. RCD type 2 on the other hand has a 5-year mortality of 50% and can be complicated by ulcerative jejunitis or enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL). Management of RCD type 2 has challenged many experts, and different treatment approaches have been adopted with variable results. Some of these treatments include immunomodulation with azathioprine and steroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, alemtuzumab (an anti CD-52 monoclonal antibody), and cladribine or fludarabine sometimes with autologous stem cell transplantation. In this article, we summarise the management approach to patients with RCD type 2.

Optimizing hereditary angioedema management through tailored treatment approaches.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare but serious and potentially life threatening autosomal dominant condition caused by low or dysfunctional C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) or uncontrolled contact pathway activation. Symptoms are characterized by spontaneous, recurrent attacks of subcutaneous or submucosal swellings typically involving the face, tongue, larynx, extremities, genitalia or bowel. The prevalence of HAE is estimated to be 1:50,000 without known racial differences. It causes psychological stress as well as significant socioeconomic burden. Early treatment and prevention of attacks are associated with better patient outcome and lower socioeconomic burden. New treatments and a better evidence base for management are emerging which, together with a move from hospital-centered to patient-centered care, will enable individualized, tailored treatment approaches.

Recognising and Managing Refractory Coeliac Disease: A Tertiary Centre Experience.

Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) is a rare complication of coeliac disease (CD) and involves malabsorption and villous atrophy despite adherence to a strict gluten-free diet (GFD) for at least 12 months in the absence of another cause. RCD is classified based on the T-cells in the intra-epithelial lymphocyte (IEL) morphology into type 1 with normal IEL and type 2 with aberrant IEL (clonal) by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for T cell receptors (TCR) at the ß/γ loci. RCD type 1 is managed with strict nutritional and pharmacological management. RCD type 2 can be complicated by ulcerative jejunitis or enteropathy associated lymphoma (EATL), the latter having a five-year mortality of 50%. Management options for RCD type 2 and response to treatment differs across centres and there have been debates over the best treatment option. Treatment options that have been used include azathioprine and steroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, campath (an anti CD-52 monoclonal antibody), and cladribine or fluadribine with or without autologous stem cell transplantation. We present a tertiary centre's experience in the treatment of RCD type 2 where treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine was used, and our results show good response with histological recovery in 56.6% of treated individuals.